The Horrible Escape of Robert E. Lee

On this day in 1863, the Confederate Army of Northern Virginia departed from Gettysburg following its most devastating defeat two days earlier — a three-day bloodbath culminating in a fantastic military blunder by Robert E. Lee known as Pickett’s Charge (or Longstreet’s Charge).

A wagon train of wounded soldiers 17 miles long followed the beleaguered southern troops through the rain to the Potomac River where they were stopped dead by rising flood waters and destroyed pontoon bridges.

The war could have ended during that retreat. With President Lincoln practically chewing the paint off the walls of the D.C. telegraph office, urging Union General George Meade to attack the retreating army, Meade let Lee slip back across the river into Virginia almost entirely unscathed.

Oh the possibilities. Had Meade attacked and crushed the demoralized, crippled rebels, the horrors of 1864 and 1865 (including the nightmarish carnage at the Wilderness, Spotsylvania and especially Cold Harbor) would never have taken place. The various assaults on the ramparts at Petersburg never would have taken place. Lee’s army could have been decimated right there on the banks of the Potomac in Maryland two years prior to the actual end of the war.

Now, Meade did, in fact, pursue Lee, but it was halfhearted and pathetic. If the full strength of the Army of the Potomac could have been employed… goodbye Marse Robert, the war is over.

It’s almost heartbreaking to consider this missed opportunity.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Civil War and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/DAbitty Dee

    Why do I feel a history repeating vibe? Hmmm…

    • janefromhell

      ‘Cause Meade was a Democrat? (ducks)

  • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ nicole

    Love the history post, Bob!

  • trgahan

    The Civil War is a great study on what good leaders can do with the most limited of resources and what bad ones can do with infinite resources.

    Regarding the war, I would argue it would have been over even sooner if McClelland had pointed his 100,000 strong arm right at Richmond, VA and forced Lee to try and stop him.

  • dildenusa

    I saw 2 very good history shows yesterday on the local PBS here. One was about the French and Indian War (7 years war in Europe) from 1754 – 1763 and how it led to the American Revolution because the British were broke after defeating the French and decided to use the colonies as a cash cow. Then there was a show about Patrick Henry.

  • http://www.osborneink.com OsborneInk

    See, this is what I mean when I say that war is about hurting people and breaking their stuff. How many lives were lost in the next two years because of Meade’s tepid leadership?

  • Frank Bell

    Those who consider Gettysburg, or many battles, in retrospect tend to think of the troops as chess pieces who could be moved at will.

    It was not just Lee’s troops who were exhausted and laden with casualties. The Union forces were similarly exhausted, even though they forced the rebels into retreat.

    Meade’s failures aside–and they were many–it is unlikely that his troops could have immediately, without rest, mounted a forced march over unfriendly territory to be followed by more battle.

    The Face of Battle makes for very good reading on this subject:

    http://www.amazon.com/Face-Battle-Study-Agincourt-Waterloo/dp/0140048979

    • BuffaloBuckeye

      From what very little I know, that is my understanding as well. One force pretty well defeated and the other pretty well spent.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7CIEJ6SAP7XK4BO4ODWHQM76OE Ryan

    A major contributing factor to Meade’s sloth, at least early in the pursuit, arose due to the nature of the fighting July 1-3. In his efforts to shuffle forces from one end of his interior lines to the other, Meade ended up massively commingling all of his corps with the exception of the 6th. This put the command – and – control apparatus into fubar status, at least for the purposes of organizing an offensive. Meade’s hesitancy played a more substantial role later on in the pursuit, but let’s not forget that guy took command just a few days before G-burg. I would have spent the following three weeks holed up w/ some rye somewhere in central PA, telegraphs from Stanton & Lincoln be damned.
    BTW, Bob – keep up the great work at this blog, as well as the podcast with El -D! It’s still Goddamn Awesome around these here parts!

  • http://twitter.com/bphoon Brian C


    Regarding the war, I would argue it would have been over even sooner if McClelland had pointed his 100,000 strong arm right at Richmond, VA and forced Lee to try and stop him.

    The incompetence of nearly every general Lincoln had at his disposal to command the Army of the Potomac is stunning to this very day. Had McClellan marched on Richmond in late ’61 or early ’62 he might well have ended the Confederacy right there. However, as has been said in more than one Civil War history, all the good generals we had went over to the South, leaving Lincoln with pretty much the dregs.

    The comments on the state of Meade’s army are pretty spot on regarding its physical and organizational condition. However, a competent commander, anticipating the fog of war, could have cobbled together an effective pursuit and, given the even worse condition of the rebel army, should have been able to render them combat ineffective pretty much for the duration. Lincoln would have been able then to demand surrender.

    For ratification of this line of thinking, see the feats of field leadership of people like George Patton or Alexander the Great. Great leaders get more out of their people than one has a right to expect. On the field of battle, they insist on nothing less than victory.

    Even with his shortcomings, I consider Meade one of Lincoln’s more able commanders, at least until the arrival of Grant. His performance at Gettysburg shows that. Unfortunately, he wasn’t the man to put Lee’s efforts to an end.

    Another stunner to me (I served in the US Army for 21 years, retiring in ’97) is how so many of Lincoln’s commanders got away with blowing him off for so long. The man was President and the generals were sworn to obey his orders. I just don’t get that…different era and circumstances, I know, but still…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Francis-Zuccarello/735776491 Francis Zuccarello

    If you all think that violent Confederate treason would have ended with one more battle above the Mason Dixon line, you are kidding yourselves.

  • pgeorge

    I spent the evening of July 3 re-watching “Gettysburg” and enjoyed reading many of the comments here. So frustrating watching the film knowing it SHOULD have ended the war… and did not. But damn Lee for realizing he needed a victory or could not win the war… and then getting caught up again in his own mythos.

    And Bob, thanks for posting the climax of the Battle for Little Round Top last year. It’s the best scene in a great movie.