Worse Than We Thought

According to a new report from the Economics for Equity and the Environment Network, the estimated cost to society per ton of CO2 released into the atmosphere may be 45 times higher than previously estimated by the federal government.

The study found the true cost of those emissions to be far beyond the $21 per ton derived by the federal government.

The figure, commonly known as the “social cost of carbon,” is used by federal agencies when weighing the costs and benefits of emissions-cutting regulations, such as air conditioner efficiency standards and greenhouse gas emissions limits for light trucks.

A truer value, according the Economics for Equity and the Environment Network, an umbrella organization of economists who advocate for environmental protection, could be as high as $900 per ton—equivalent to adding $9 to each gallon of gas. Viewed another way, with the U.S. emitting the equivalent of close to 6 billion tons of carbon dioxide annually, the higher figure suggests that avoiding those emissions could save the nation $5.3 trillion annually, one-third of the nation’s economic output.*

A second, separate report released July 12 buttressed the argument, finding that the government routinely underestimates the benefits of avoiding climate change when conducting cost-benefit analysis on regulations aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

Rather than discussing the debt burden we’re going to leave behind for our grandchildren, we should be discussing the environmental catastrophe that awaits them. We should be discussing how our lack of spending on infrastructure and green energy will make their lives that much more difficult.

The economic costs of doing nothing will, in the future, dwarf our current fiscal problems in their severity.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Environment and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://hubpages.com/profile/KKalmes Kkalmes

    While we shout from the rooftops about fiscal irresponsibility and middle-class genocide… we should probably take a minute to realize that the short heat wave we have experienced throughout the country will one day be the norm, but without the energy required to give respite behind closed doors with the a/c on.

    It will rightly be called Armageddon… we will have brought it on ourselves through ignorance, selfishness, arrogance, domestic-political issues fatigue, stubbornness and a deliberate disregard for the truth!

    “The economic costs of doing nothing will, in the future, dwarf our current fiscal problems in their severity.” JMAshby

    • http://twitter.com/bphoon Brian C

      I’m not sure sitting in your house without a/c in 104-degree heat, or conversely, sitting in your house without heat in 0-degree cold, is quite what the GOP has in mind when they talk about taking us back to “simpler times.” I remember what it was like to swelter through a Midwest summer without a/c–and it was miserable. Likewise, freezing through a Midwest winter…

      They just don’t get it, do they?

  • http://cousinavi.wordpress.com cousinavi

    The idea that Americans are entitled to cheap gasoline has long been one of the foremost indicators that Americans have their heads jammed WAY up their asses. People have NEVER paid the REAL cost of the resources they take – not coal, not oil, not water, not topsoil…nothing. And America, having taken the lions share of it all, owes the lion’s share of back pay.
    Taxes, abortion, gays (generally, married or in the military), creationism, and a host of other shit the rest of the world has either figured out or can’t be bothered about…sprinkles on the icing of the doom cake.

  • carolcoronis

    I was thinking of this the other day listening to NPR. I caught the end of a conversation. The discussion ~ shoring up safety measures at nuclear power plants based on what we witnessed in Japan and some idiot who should know better said “that isn’t necessary, there is no proof that it could happen here.” The conversation was not about the Tsunami ~ it was accidents and water damage. I wondered what proof he was waiting for? Why do humans with brains wait for a catastrophe before they take any action. Reverse engineering needed.

  • dildenusa

    Yeah. This is the elephant (if wild elephants will exist in 50 more years) in the room nobody, not even President Obama, wants to talk about. And the whackos on the fundamentalist and republican fringe live in denial or actually believe it’s the hell for democrats after the crapture.

    According to Curt Stager, in his book Deep Future, the results of emitting 5000 giga tons (5000 billion tons) of carbon will be felt for tens of thousands of years into the future.

  • http://www.facebook.com/blackdogsailing Scott Thomas

    No shiiiiit. The deficit hawks all bitch about the debt we’re gonna leave our children, but say nothing about the strong likelihood that it’ll be all used up by the time they have kids, and we haven’t figured out what to use in its place. Or that by using coal or natural gas cause its cheap and plentiful, is devouring their human habitat never mind that of the oceans and other sources of human sustenance.

  • http://www.facebook.com/blackdogsailing Scott Thomas

    “the government routinely underestimates the benefits of avoiding climate change”

    Terry Gross interview with Heidi Cullen, author of the book “The Weather of the Future” could shed a bit more light on that quote.
    http://www.npr.org/2011/07/25/138601271/weather-warnings-for-a-climate-changed-planet

    I think $900/ton is cheap after hearing the interview. We have no idea.