Quote of the Morning

“No, I don’t see that.” Newt Gingrich when asked if he thinks it was offensive for him to say that black people demand food stamps

ThinkProgress notes:

The overwhelming majority of African-Americans are not on food stamps. Indeed, the majority of people who receive food stamps are white. Most recipients are also either children or seniors who are of retirement age. In 2010, working women represented only 28 percent of recipients, and working-age men represented only 17 percent.

And one of the prevailing reasons why a portion of the African American population remains impoverished, and why much of the African American population experiences racial discrimination, is due directly to white oppression and subjugation for the better part of the lifespan of this nation. For more than a century following a war over the issue of slavery, whites demonized blacks and suppressed their advancement through campaigns of fear that transcended all strata of our culture from entertainment to politics.

Yes, Mr. Gingrich, food stamps are a critical means of support. And yes, some people abuse the system — just as corporations, the super-rich and, indeed, politicians abuse the system every damn day. But food stamps are necessary if only to allow less fortunate Americans, white and black, to buy food while they’re pulling themselves out of the economic hole created by you, Mr. Gingrich, and your Reaganomics screw-pals, not to mention the white supremacist bastards who locked American society into a state of apartheid for more than two centuries.

The same strategy that was used in anti-black propaganda like Birth of a Nation and other forms of exploitation intended to stir up support for Jim Crow laws and to unite southern and northern whites through mutual fear, resentment and hatred during the post-Reconstruction years is being employed — right now — by Newt Gingrich and the Republican Party. It’s called the Southern Strategy. For this, the press and most decent Americans should reject this monochromatic gaggle of bigots from our national stage and reject them from enjoying any kind of serious regard in the press and elsewhere.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Quote and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/mikecalma Mike Calma

    What should be of interest also is the fact that not one of the other candidates spoke up and opposed that opinion and by that silence tacitly agreed with it. We saw the same thing during the Republican debate in Orlando when Stephen Hill, a gay soldier stationed in Iraq, was jeered by the audience after asking if the candidates would revert back to that DADT days. All the candidates were roundly criticized the following the debate for not condemning the jeers. This is the way these people roll. If you aren’t a heterosexual white person they don’t want to know you. Oh, and you have to be rich too. That never hurts.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7VZNIFV5UXBX5LETCRH34M5HG4 Staci Bass

    Just overheard a conversation from the Tea Party person across the office:

    “Those people on unemployment just take government money and use it to live on.” (said with a fair dose of disdain)

    Un-fucking-believable.

    • i_a_c

      Never mind what unemployment actually is. It’s INSURANCE against being laid off. You actually have to PROVE you’re looking for a job.

      What a bunch of nutjobs.

    • Byproxy73

      Hopefully, the person who said that will be the next person to lose their job.

      • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7VZNIFV5UXBX5LETCRH34M5HG4 Staci Bass

        He would be like Mitt – he has money, came from money and cannot/will not ever visualize a world where he doesn’t always have it BECAUSE HE DESERVES IT. Another fucker born on third base and telling the world they hit a triple.

  • i_a_c

    Newt’s been using the Southern Strategy for a while. Remember when he parroted a crazy Forbes opinion piece accusing the president of “Kenyan anti-colonialism?” Yeah. Newt may or may not be a racist, but he’s certainly playing to that crowd.

    • GlassBull

      For whatever reason, a racist’s world view has been poisoned to think poorly of people they’ve never met and know nothing about, and that is sad.

      But to not be a racist and employ the Southern Strategy to win the votes of racists? That’s even sadder.

      • http://drangedinaz.wordpress.com/ IrishGrrrl

        “But to not be a racist and employ the Southern Strategy to win the votes of racists? That’s even sadder.”

        No, that’s the definition of evil, not sad.

  • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ nicole

    Spot on, Bob.

    These idiot bigots are a stain on this country, not to mention humanity.

  • GrafZeppelin127

    It seems to me that a lot of Republican voters and fans need to feel heroic, hence they need to feel victimized and resentful and so they need their candidates, officeholders and media personalities to validate that resentment. Democrats spent generations trying to help people who were victimized (by the system, by society, by institutionalized discrimination, etc.) and who had legitimate reasons to resent those who had it so easy by comparison, and got a lot of electoral mileage out of it; Republicans want that too. Hence the absurdity that somehow white Christians, or more specifically straight white Christian men, are the persecuted minority being unfairly taken advantage of by everyone else, or by [insert traditional Democratic constituency here].

    A lot of what I hear on Fox and on Conservative™ radio seems geared toward making their listeners feel heroic. “You are the heroes; they are the villains!” regardless of who “they” are. Ask people why they vote Republican and they’ll tell you (after they get through the empty rhetorical pablum about “small government” and what-not that the GOP does not actually care about) that some segment of the population is unfairly benefiting from Democratic policies at their expense, and the GOP will put a stop to it, take that benefit away, make “those people” deal with and suffer for their own whatever and stop making me pay for it, yada yada yada. People vote Republican to “stick it to” whoever it is they’ve been told to resent.

    • http://phydeauxpseaks.blogspot.com Bob Rutledge

      Quoted to the Book of Faces (with link and everything). :)

  • i_a_c

    Thought this might be a good place to post this.

    “Lighter version of Obama” -Perry
    “Paler shade of what we have” -Santorum

    These very well may be innocent tongue slips. But they make you wonder.

  • mrbrink

    If you abuse the SNAP system you are breaking the law and if found guilty can serve up to 10 years in prison with outrageous fines. So it’s not like there are no repercussions for lying and cheating just to get some extra fucking food.

    This down-punching and vilification of the poor and working poor living off supplemental nutrition programs is a lot like Demolition Man making war on the sewer people who’ve resorted to jacking Taco Bell trucks for survival.

    Adding, the racist component of the attack is the work of a rotten soul.

    • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ nicole

      It’s completely disgusting. And it’s instilled in me an even stronger hatred for everything GOP.

      Bunch of nasty white racist assholes with piles of money who don’t give a rat’s ass if everyone else is suffering.

  • http://twitter.com/maxcat07 Irene Budoff

    Martin Luther King, Jr…
    “Whenever the government provides opportunities and privileges for white people and rich people they call it ‘subsidies.’ When they do it for Negro and poor people they call it ‘welfare.’ The fact is that everybody in this country lives on welfare. Suburbia was built with federally subsidized credit. And highways that take our white brothers out to the suburbs were built with federally subsidized money to the tune of ninety percent. Everybody is on welfare in this country. The problem is that we all too often have socialism for the rich and rugged free enterprise capitalism for the poor. That’s the problem.”

  • http://drangedinaz.wordpress.com/ IrishGrrrl

    It just struck me, reading this post how poverty is passed on from generation to generation and how much longer my ancestors have been free to pursue economic improvement compared to the average black person’s slave ancestor. My white ancestors ranged from the wealthy British who settled on colonial land given to them by a colonies governor and ran a plantation to the shoeless and starving Irish immigrant arriving illegally on America’s shores with nothing but the clothes on his back or to the middle class German doctor who settled down and had 9 sons. None of whom were slaves. They arrived as early as 1752 (maybe earlier this the date I have for the German doctor). Taking that date we’re talking about a span of 259 years. The last immigrant to come over was the Irish ancestor in 1856. So the least amount of time would have been 155 years, or approx. 15 generations.

    Yes, I said 259 years or approximately 25 generations to 155 years or 15 generations for the white descendants to reach our current socioeconomic status in America. Note they started better off because they were mostly FREE people, so they had something to build off of. Also note the white males were either naturalized or born-here citizens.

    Compare that to slaves. They were first brought here as slaves with no possessions or freedom of any kind around 1607. They remained slaves until Pres. Lincoln set them free in 1863. So slavery existed in the U.S. almost exclusively (but not entirely) limited to Africans for 256 years. So they were slaves in the U.S. longer than my ancestors have been free in the U.S.

    Furthermore, they weren’t legally equal until the end of the Civil Rights movement of 1968. That means between 1863 until 1968, there was a whole lot of stagnation. And that kind of beat down doesn’t go away over night.

    Some might quibble that African Americans became legally equal with the 15th Amendment in 1870 but I’m not buying it and neither should you. They had to be equal in every way legal in order to label them so. So using legal equality beginning at 1968 to the present I’d say they’ve had all of 43 years….about 4 generations to improve their socioeconomic situation.

    And finally that 43 years hasn’t been in a vacuum of perfect equality…far from it. Racism is very real regardless of what the law says. So it hasn’t been 43 years of bliss.

    So when white voters moan and groan about having to pay taxes to support welfare queens, which is code for African Americans and which studies show do not exist, they are actually saying the following:

    “My ancestors only took 259 years to make it in America, what’s wrong with the African Americans that they can’t make it in 43?”

    Teh Stoopid, it hurts my brain.

    • http://twitter.com/maxcat07 Irene Budoff

      Wonderful post! I’ve never seen the progression of the two races (or the digression) stated so logically and with such an abundance of fact. Thanks for making the case so clearly. My ancestors came to this country at the beginning of the 20th century as Russian-Jewish immigrants, but even THEY had far less to overcome, mainly due to a pigmentation issue.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_7VZNIFV5UXBX5LETCRH34M5HG4 Staci Bass

      1000 x liked.

      ADDING: When I say to people that it can still be punitive to black people in some places within this country if “they” decide you’ve “gotten out of your place”, I’m called a liar, a whiner and other sorts of words I’m sure they have no idea what they mean. I’ve been accused of making excuses for a bunch of lazy, ghetto people. Believe me, I call black people out on the regular for their the white man is keeping me down bullshit because in many cases, we do a fine job of keeping ourselves down, but there are still some real issues out here and the election of Barack H. Obama has brought them out of the woodwork in droves in our “post-racial America”.

    • ArrogantDemon

      Ding…ding….god dammit, ding

  • incredulous72

    To be honest, I’m not surprised by the actions of these candidates. Their only platform to run on is the “otherness” of President Obama and the bottom line is that “otherness” is race.

    Everything that comes out of their mouths regarding the policies put forth by this administration are complete absurdities; it’s as if we’re all living in an alternate universe in which right is wrong and up is down. They know the truth, that what the Obama administration wants to accomplish is not only reasonable but imperative to the health and well being of this country. They will not however let that happen; a black man coming in and rectifying the course of this country after the previous republican administration’s complete fuck-up?! Hell No!

    To those that object to President Obama completely on the grounds of racism (which they will not admit to), they will turn their backs on themselves and all policies that will benefit them because the “black guy” in the White House instituted those policies. For those that are running, they know this about their own party like they know the backs of their own hands.

    Newt is a “good ‘ole boy”. He not only knows the politics of racism within his own party, it’s how he himself got to a place of prominence within the party. He knows what will play in South Carolina to those that were sitting in the seats of that auditorium and those that were watching. He also knows he doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of securing the republican nomination, so he can throw out all the racist redmeat he wants and it won’t come back to bite him.

  • ArrogantDemon

    I happen to look at the local Fox station morning news, and when they had a report on food stamps, guess who they had in the shot? Lots of black and brown and very little white. The news dont want to go to teh rural areas and show white people standing in food lines and food stamp lines, that would hurt the illusion