New Procedures Close Door on Military Detention

The Obama Administration issued new procedures yesterday regarding military detention under the NDAA. The new procedures are so strict and red-tape-y that, according to even the president’s political opponents, will lead to the law rarely seeing the light of day, if ever.

Under broadly written categorical waivers carved out by the Obama administration, the military custody requirement will be waived if the suspect’s home country objected to military custody; if the individual is a lawful permanent resident arrested in the country or for conduct conducted in the country; when a suspect is originally charged with something other than a terrorism offense; when a person is originally arrested by state or local law enforcement; when a transfer to military custody “could interfere with efforts to secure an individual’s cooperation or confession”; or when transferring an individual might interfere with joint trials with other defendants.

President Obama also said that the Attorney General, working with other national security officials, has the ability to issue additional waivers for “categories of conduct, or for categories of individuals, or on an individual case-by-case basis, when doing so is in the interest of national security.”

Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institute wrote that Obama’s procedures had “read this law virtually out of existence.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who supports placing some terrorism suspects into military custody, agreed.

“These procedures make clear that the National Defense Authorization Act expressly exempts U.S. citizens from mandatory military detention, but they also make it so procedurally difficult that effectively, no individual of any nationality will likely ever be transferred to mandatory military custody under section 1022,” Grassley said in a prepared statement for a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the matter on Wednesday. “Between the bureaucratic requirements and the seven national security waivers, it is clear the provision will be seldom, if ever used on anyone, let alone a U.S. citizen.”

I’m sure some professionally-paranoid individual out there is already spinning this as some kind of back-door to indefinite detention which is being left open intentionally for some nefarious purpose, but it seems fairly clear to me that the Obama Administration is using every tool within its power to lock this door for good. And that’s no easy task when congress has continuously undermined the process of undoing Bush’s various War on Terror blunders.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Terrorism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/KQuark KQµårk™

    Of course the biggest spin on this will be that it only matters when Obama or the Dems are in the oval office. Well duh then reelect Obama and don’t enable the GOP. Of course some day maybe even this election the GOP will take back the WH but this is just one more reason that anyone on the left who parrots the Lazicrat meme both parties are the same is wrong.

  • stacib23

    Woo hoo, Jon Stewart – we’re calling your name.

  • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ nicole

    Fucking AWESOME.

    Not that we didn’t expect him to do something along these lines, but I am beginning to wish that term limits weren’t so rigid.

    (yes, I know I would be grateful for term limits next time a dipwad republican is in the WH)

    EDIT: can not wait to read greenwald’s crap tomorrow so I can make fun of him.

    • villemar

      Just loving the descent of Greenbeck, his minions, the firebaggers, the Paultards , the Alex Jones cultists, the Bradly-Manning-is-the-Baby-Jesus crowd, the unrconstructed PUMA deadenders and all of the other emoprogs into further irrelevancy.

      It serves them right, karma’s a bitch, this is what they get for launching the biggest ratfuck jihad ever under the false banner of progressivism; unending and ongoing since day one of the inauguration of our first African American President.

      • mrbrink

        Oh, hell yeah!

        • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ nicole

          Ditto that!

      • http://www.politicalruminations.com/ nicole

        I feel very much the same!

      • Scopedog

        Hell, you’ll like this, then:

        http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/dave-lindorff/41667/president-barack-obama-and-his-key-advisors-are-a-gang-of-war-criminals

        ….Of course, Greenwald and co. will never cut Obama any slack, and even when the Administration is clearly going in the opposite direction from Bush Jr., they will still claim otherwise.

        For them to admit that they were wrong….nah, they’ll never do it.

        • villemar

          Ah, good old Dave Lindorff. “And he is………and this would be regardinnnnnnngggg………” (in my David Spade voice).

          Seriously look at his pic there. He’s so baked he can’t even keep his eyes open. Yeah I’m going to defer my opinions on international law to THAT guy.

      • MarshallLucky

        Man, the left can really come together behind statements like this!

        • villemar

          See, I don’t consider anarcho-nihilism to be “The Left.” I do not consider complete and utter rejection of the practical application of governance in the third largest country on the planet in 2012 to be “The Left.”

  • ArrogantDemon

    Oh, what will the firebaggers have to say?

    The Ronulans wont have any case to try and lure dumb lefties to their side, damn him, damn that Barack Obama, he’s ruining everything

    • Scopedog

      And BOOM! goes Greenwald’s head….