Far-Left and Right Are An Embarrassment

Did David Axelrod participate in discussions of who to kill? Did President Obama personally add names to a “kill list?”

According to many outlets, yes. Those outlets would reference the New York Times as their source, but according to The New York Times, they never said any of it.

In fact, in the Times article reported that Mr. Axelrod had attended some Tuesday counterterrorism meetings in the White House Situation Room in the aftermath of the failed bombing of a Detroit-bound airliner on Christmas Day in 2009. It did not say that Mr. Axelrod had participated in discussions of which terrorists should be placed on the so-called kill list. But that assertion was falsely attributed to The Times article by The Weekly Standard and other conservative media outlets.

On the left, too, there were thousands of posts with inaccurate claims about what The Times had reported. Many picked up what a blogger for the conspiracy-minded PrisonPlanet wrote on the day the article appeared: that The Times had said Mr. Obama had placed several Americans and a 17-year-old girl, all with alleged links to the branch of Al Qaeda in Yemen, on the kill list. What the article actually said was that Mr. Obama was shown an intelligence document at a Tuesday counterterrorism meeting in January 2010 with the names and photographs of the Qaeda suspects, including some Americans and a 17-year-old girl. The article said Mr. Obama knew that he might be asked to add such terrorism suspects to the kill list — but it did not say he had been asked to do so in this case. Nor did it say that he had done so.

Referring to a list of potential terrorist targets assembled by the intelligence community as a “kill list” is hyperbolic in itself and is clearly intended to evoke dystopic images in readers’ heads. Going a step further and calling the president a “murderer” or implying that he has personally chosen people to be on the list is grossly irresponsible and misleading, among other things.

And that’s before you consider the fact that they all got it wrong.

What really happened is a chain of outlets staffed by hipsters seeking greater hipster-cred, on the far-left and far-right, all quoted each other in a circle jerk game of “who can write the most hyperbolic shit?” And the winner of this game wins nothing other than embarrassment.

Bob was right to call it a “conspiracy nexus” because that’s exactly what this is, and at some point in this nexus the far-left and far-right meet each other face to face and, instead of disagreeing, shake each other’s hands as they express their common distrust of The Man.

Needless to say, these opinions are my own. I won’t be quoting Alex Jones’s Prison Planet.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Epic Fail and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • jmby

    And here’s the thing: Most people won’t ever even have this on their radar. I am pretty aware of what’s going on in the political blogosphere, and I didn’t know. Nor do I care when it comes to crap like this. I can take it for what it’s worth, dismiss it for the shit it is, and be thankful for once that most Americans are way too preoccupied with the idiot Bachlorette and which contestant Cee-Lo thinks is the next whatever. No one but the circle-jerkers who create this bullshit ever sees it. Thank goodness.

    • Scopedog

      Agreed.

  • Scopedog

    Why am I not surprised at this? You just illustrated the painful truth–go far enough to the Left, you’ll run into the Right.

    I just read a moan-and-groan post over at Crooked Timber that did exactly what you pointed out, JM. And of course they had to genuflect at the altar of Greenwald.

    Look, I have my own worries about drone strikes. But on the other hand, Jay Adler at The Sad Red Earth wrote a brilliant post about why drone strikes are needed, despite the uneasiness we may have about them. But he also delivers a hammer blow to Greenwald and others like him who are more concerned about drone strikes but haven’t said shit about the GOP’s war on women, minority voters, the economy, the Wisconsin recall, or the fact that the GOP has been the real source of the country’s problems for the last few years.

    The article is here:

    http://sadredearth.com/threats-to-democracy/

    If these fuckheads are going to resort to twisting the facts and ignoring the GOP’s shenanigans, screw them. If they really believe that drone strikes will end under Romney, then screw them.

  • stacib23

    And the winner for the person yelling “murderer” the loudest when referencing Obama – Jeremy Scahill. Jeez, I can’t stand that guy.

    • Scopedog

      I used to like Scahill….but now, I feel the gorge rise in my throat when I hear his name.

      If Scahill thinks that this will all go away if Romney wins, he’s got another thought coming. Plus, he falls back on the “both parties are the same” crap, and I fucking HATE that meme.

      • stacib23

        “both parties are the same” crap, and I fucking HATE that meme.

        I hope you weren’t watching Jon Stewart last night. If so, you probably spent your day picking up the exploded pieces of your head.

    • villemar

      Yeah, fuck that guy. By the way, on the subject of Droners like Scahill and Greenbeck, ABL was on the Hal Sparks radio show on Saturday and just. killed. it. This is awesome, and worth a listen: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/06/02/abl-on-the-hal-sparks-radio-program-talking-ranting-really-about-lady-business-and-drones/

  • i_a_c

    The Alex Jones Left rears its ugly head again. From “Obama is cracking down on Occupy protests” to “Obama is going to kill me,” the paranoid nutjob contingent of America is not limited to the right wing.

    There is a brilliant Daily Kos diary from several months ago which dubs the phenomenon Ashby speaks of the “Circle Jerk of Attribution“.

  • villemar

    Good old Alex Jones. I would put him as having been at the far far left several years ago, having completely crossed over the Bridge of Anarcho-Nihilism on the far side of the moon, now fully into the far, far, extreme right. Really, I no longer see any difference between his syphillitic rantings and the stuff in the Turner Diaries or on Jared Lee Loughner’s Myspace page. His cultists are truly extreme. I have personally observed, on both PBO’s FB page and the White House page (before they were asssumedly flagged and removed), threats to kill this president and expressions of desire that the President be assassinated. One would think they would come from inbred bucktoothed Neoconfederate Teabagger retards, but no, the one thing in common they all had were they were all Alex Jones/Infowars cultists. They also love to spam screaming rants in all-caps, which is charming. And of course, they have all solidly gone Full Birthtard, which is to be expected.

    I do think we’ll see some stochatic terrorism from him and his minions if PBO gets re-elected. Like I said, they’re in Turner Diaries territory at this point.

  • http://profiles.google.com/jadopine Jim Oliver

    “And the winner of this game wins nothing other than embarrassment.”

    Seriously? Dude, that’s not how it works. Embarrassment is NEVER imposed anymore. Most likely the prize is a well-paid sinecure at a think tank (on the far right), or fame and notoriety (on the far left).

    How many people disappeared never to be hear from again after writing something egregiously wrong? Has David Brooks been fired? Hell, has Megan McArdle been fired? Or Jonah Goldberg?

    THIS is the game now – who can do the most outragious thing and get away with it?

    We can call the game ” Where Is The Line? ” Cause I don’t see one anymore