Fleeing the Climate Crisis

I’ve always thought that most Americans would simply rather put up with the effects of the climate crisis than to push for systemic changes that would mitigate it.

And I think I’m right
. Coastal communities are moving to higher ground and/or building structures to block the rising ocean.

The issue of whether to stay or flee is being confronted around the globe. Places experimenting with retreat have adopted various strategies. In Britain, for example, several sites along the Essex coast have deliberately breached seawalls to create salt marshes, which act as a natural barrier to flooding.

In the U.S., the starkest example can be found in Alaska, where entire villages have been forced to move to higher ground or are thinking about it in the face of melting sea ice. Hawaii’s famous beaches are slowly shrinking and some scientists think it’s a matter of time before the state has to explore whether to move back development.

I currently live one block away from the Pacific Ocean — near one of those “famous beaches,” by the way.

People are weird. It’s going to cost less and be far less inconvenient to do something about carbon and energy than to be constantly running away from the problem — all the while picking up the pieces of broken lives and broken towns after major climate events destroy huge chunks of civilization.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Environment and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/bubblegenius Bubble Genius

    Sadly, I think people have more confidence in the potential ravages of Mother Nature than of their elected officeholders’ ability to effect change. And with good reason.

  • http://twitter.com/GodIsDead Gern Blandston

    WITHIN STATISTICALLY ACCEPTABLE NORMS ARGLEBLARGLE #headdeskdeskdeskdesk

  • Bill Skeels

    Moving out of the path, so to speak, is actually a very good thing, and encourages the formation / re-formation of natural barriers, e.g., salt marshes, dunes, barrier islands. As building hard structures near the coast discourages such things. This is actually a good trend.

    • http://drangedinaz.wordpress.com/ IrishGrrrl

      Actually we should be doing both retreating (and letting things return to their natural state) and investing in mitigation to slow climate change down (if that is even possible this late in the game).

  • http://twitter.com/mikecalma Mike Calma

    Run away!!! Run away!!!!!

  • muselet

    Retreat and mitigation efforts make sense, but only in the context of actually, you know, doing something about the underlying problem.

    Germany is aggressively pursuing distributed solar, most countries in the EU are pushing for lower car CO2 emissions (in the UK, cars producing less than 100g/km are exempt from road-use tax), European houses are vastly more energy-efficient than American houses, &c.

    What are we Americans doing? Demanding the extraction of yet more petroleum products to feed those stupid, oversized SUVs.

    It’s going to cost less and be far less inconvenient to do something about carbon and energy than to be constantly running away from the problem …

    Absolutely true. However, doing something about the problem requires spending money (which, the Rs inform us, we don’t have, or at least can’t spend on anything that doesn’t go boom) on basic and applied research (which attention-seeking dimbulbs going back at least to William Proxmire have ridiculed) in pursuit of alternatives to the primary products of some of the world’s largest corporations (which are not going to stand for the loss of profits).

    Now you’ll have to excuse me. I need to spend some time with the lolcats to cheer myself up.

    –alopecia

    • http://drangedinaz.wordpress.com/ IrishGrrrl

      Alo haz a sad :(

      • muselet

        Well, yeah. Can you blame me? Actually, I’m more crabby than sad. Just for the record. ;^)

        I mean, there is a certain amount of hurry-up involved here—we can’t keep denying and dawdling—but there’s no magic to cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Improving efficiency, cutting consumption and pursuing alternate sources of energy aren’t enough on their own, but that’s no excuse for not pursuing stopgap measures. Yet we have one major political party that openly giggles whenever someone uses the expression “green energy” and another which can’t seem to agree internally in which direction the sun appears in the morning (let along what to do about global warming). Add to that the boneheads in the general public who don’t want to give up their big SUVs and their big eff-off pickup trucks and big V-8s in their muscle cars, and we have a recipe for continuing to do nothing.

        Maybe when the seawater reaches their lower lips, the Rs and the nitwits will decide it’s time to act. (Probably not, though, ’cause global warming is a fiction created by George Soros blah, blah, blah.)

        Some days, I hate people more than others. This is not one of those other days.

        –alopecia

        • http://profiles.google.com/jadopine Jim Oliver

          “—we can’t keep denying and dawdling—”

          SURE WE CAN!!

          Certain factions of our political society are, in fact, counting on it. By denying and dawdling, we pile up even more evidence that Teh Gubmint can’t accomplish anything, so therefore we should outsource ALL functions to huge corporations which don’t provide pensions or health care for their employees, and give the CEO massive stock options. Which he will then turn around and shovel into SuperPACs to elect the same guys who got him the contract.

          EVERYONE WINS!! AMERICA, F- YEAH!!

  • mrbrink

    And so, the human migration from our problems begins. You can run, but you can’t hide.

  • D_C_Wilson

    North Caroline passed a law last week making it illegal for the sea to rise, so no worries.