GOP Votes for Polluted Water

The U.S. House voted to approve a rider in the energy and water appropriations bill today aimed at removing protections for America’s rivers, lakes, and streams.

Washington, D.C. — Today the U.S. House of Representatives voted against Clean Water Act protections for streams, lakes, and rivers across the United States. The House majority voted to keep a Dirty Water Rider in the House’s Energy and Water Appropriations bill, which would expose 60 percent of our country’s streams and at least 20 million acres of wetlands to toxic pollution and threaten the drinking water of 117 million Americans. The Dirty Water Rider was introduced by Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT) in an effort to block the Obama administration from protecting waters of the United States, making it easier for polluters to dump their waste into our waters.

If you’re going to vote to approve a bill that may expose the drinking water of 117 million people to toxic pollutants, I suppose Friday is the best time to do that. You know, so no one will notice.

Fortunately, it’s unlikely this will become law. And like the transportation bill that has yet to see the light of day, we can expect the House of Boehner to sit on their hands from now until the next session of congress.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Environment and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • http://twitter.com/gbeaudette Grant Beaudette

    Good job, guy running for Senate. This’ll look great in campaign ads.

  • Ned F

    I’m sure this is about job creation somehow. That is their main focus, right?

    • D_C_Wilson

      Well, they voted on another abortion bill today.

  • i_a_c

    I know Republicans hate environmentalists, but I never understood why they actually want businesses to be able to pollute rivers and streams. Yeah, like that won’t have any side-effects, like poisoning water supply (incl. for irrigation), disrupting the food chain, etc. They oppose the Clean Water Act for reasons I simply cannot wrap my head around. Par for the course I guess.

    • agrazingmoose

      Corporate donors say “jump” and the Republicans say, “well, doy, okay!”. They don’t even bother to ask how high.

    • http://phydeauxpseaks.blogspot.com Bob Rutledge

      but I never understood why they actually want businesses to be able to pollute rivers and streams.

      Because their vast sums of wealth will allow them to not be affected by such trivial things as no food and an unbreathable atmosphere.

      Yes, it’s nonsensical, but it’s what they believe.

  • Scopedog

    Christ. I mean….nah, screw it. You can only say, “both parties are NOT the same” and “the GOP will screw up the country big-time” so many times before you just give up in frustration.

    So, will Greenwald talk about this? Will Hamsher? Sirota? Cole? Anyone else? Or will we just continue to hear snores from the MSM and droning about drones from the Firebaggers?

    • http://phydeauxpseaks.blogspot.com Bob Rutledge

      “It’s Obama’s fault because he’s not ruling by fiat. “– Greenwald, Hamsher, Sirota, Cole, etc..

  • agrazingmoose

    If the Republicans could link abortion and environmentalists, they would. Stay tuned!