The Expensive Right-Wing Effort to Kill Obamacare

Conservatives are literally spending hundreds of millions of dollars to kill the Affordable Care Act, even though the law could be overturned by the Supreme Court early next week. My column from yesterday examined their high-priced efforts:

…Consequently, there are way too many Americans who are utterly clueless about what’s in the law, and, instead, they believe in hooey like “death panels” and insist that “Obamacare” costs a bazillion dollars — both things are clearly false, of course, beginning obviously with “death panels” which were vented like a toxic whoosh of gas from the hole in Sarah Palin’s walnut-brain and, more importantly, the law reduces deficit and pays for itself. None of that matters because the nickname for the law has “Obama” in there so it has to be destroyed.

Put another way, if President Obama is responsible for the law — any law — it must be the product of his socialistic, “anti-colonial” (??), secular, Kenyan worldview. Most conservatives, as with the details of the ACA, don’t know what any of those words actually mean, but they sound sinister so they must be crushed with extreme prejudice. Continued here…

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in The Daily Banter and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Ned F

    I think, no, I know, this will set a dangerous precedent where those that have the big money and therefore the power, to mount a public disinformation campaign against anything they don’t like about government in order to stop it or bring it down . I am aware this has happened many times, like with tobacco legislation, but I don’t remember them ever being so successful, or have this much money and clout.
    It’s starting again, now, with a lawsuit in Texas, against the constitutionality of the Consumer Protection Agency. People and pundits will poopoo it as frivolous now, but be forewarned.
    I’m still confused by the money people wanting to kill the ACA. Insurance companies are on board with the ACA, it could be very profitable for them and those who are financially comfortable can’t possibly find the mandate an intrusion. Is it simply ideological? It’s always about the money in my opinion.

  • bphoon

    If it’s really all about the money, I wonder how much, at the end of the day, the wingers will have spent to bring the ACA down if indeed they’re successful. One of their gripes is that it will increase costs on “small businesses”. Since most of the money people behind this effort are business owners and/or investors, I wonder how much of a return on their “investment” they’ll actually see. Seems to me, objectively speaking, that doing away with the ACA (by either SCOTUS decision or repeal) won’t reduce costs; on the contrary, health care costs and therefore insurance costs would most likely continue rising at current rates. So when you add the increase in health care and insurance costs over a period of time together with the total pro-rated cost (over time) of bringing the ACA down it sounds to me like a lose-lose proposition, investment-wise.

    No, I don’t think it’s really about the money. I think it’s about the power. The fat cats (regardless of how much more they think they need) already have more money than any of them could spend in their lifetimes. I think certain of them get off on the idea that they and they alone should be able to dictate to us lesser creatures how we live our lives. We should leave the big stuff–like running countries and such–to them and simply focus on our puny little lives.

    After all, they’re the Titans–Masters of the Universe, they like to call themselves–what difference do we really make? If I don’t like my lot in life, they’ll find someone else who’ll be glad to suck up their shit and thank them for the privilege so I’m not really very important in the larger scheme of things, right?

    They’re not doing this because they need to or because it’s the right thing to do. They’re doing it because they can.