The Problem with Punditry

Too often, pundits are focused on whether a candidate best appealed to a demographic group like the middle class, rather than whether the appeal is realistic. For example, Ramesh Ponnuru:

Romney made the most focused appeal to middle-class voters on the basis of how his agenda would help them — on energy, on health care, on jobs — that he ever has.

The cynicism of some political media writers and pundits is astonishing. Our discourse is poisoned by analysts who evaluate politics strictly based on superficial style instead of a realistic evaluation of whether Middle Class Policy will work. We know that conservative policies have been crushing the middle class for 30+ years. It doesn’t matter what a guilty Republican candidate says in a debate — what matters is whether the policy statement makes sense and works.

Print Friendly
This entry was posted in Election 2012 and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Ipecac

    Excellent, excellent point. Mitt Romney can go on and on about how he loves the middle class and how his policies are geared to help them but his policies clearly ARE NOT GOING TO HELP. His policies would decimate the middle class.

    Until the media stops acting like fanboys who swoon whenever a cynical politician merely mentions the middle class, like geeking out over some pop culture reference on The Simpsons, we’re boned.

  • bphoon

    Talking heads, bzzz bzzz bzzz, blah, blah, blah. Talking heads, bzzz bzzz bzzz, blah, blah, blah.

    What. The. Fuck. Ever.

  • muselet

    If I may repeat myself: Pundits? Hold them under until the bubbles stop.

    –alopecia